Blerina Matraku has reacted for a second time on social media after the publication of intimate videos in which composer Adrian Hila is also mentioned. In her message, the singer shows remorse, apologizes to his family and says the situation she is experiencing has gone beyond every human limit.
A second reaction in a harsher tone
After her first public statement, Matraku shared another long message, in which she speaks more openly about the personal and emotional consequences of the situation. She admits she was wrong and that she must take responsibility for her actions.
In this reaction, the artist says she cannot stop her tears and that the pain, according to her, has deepened to a point where she no longer knows how to cope with it.
An apology to Adrian Hila’s wife and daughters
A central part of the message is addressed to Klaudia Hila, Adrian Hila’s wife, as well as to his daughters. Matraku apologizes for the pain she may have caused them.
In her post, she mentions the tears of women, of children and of her mother, presenting the reaction as a sign of remorse and emotional burden.
She acknowledges exaggerations in earlier statements
Matraku also says that some of her earlier words were exaggerated. She describes herself as an artist who built her path through hardship and work, not through support or privilege.
In the same reaction, she suggests that she is facing alone the consequences brought by the publication of the videos and the public exposure that followed.
What she said in the first reaction
This is the singer’s second reaction within a short period of time. Earlier, she had publicly asked that the intimate videos no longer be shared and had called for respect for her privacy.
The case has prompted strong reactions on social media, while at the center remains not only the content of the statements, but also the way such intimate materials circulate and are publicly amplified.
Matraku’s latest message shows an effort to soften the tone of her earlier reactions, placing the emphasis on apology, personal responsibility and the heavy emotional cost of public exposure.
The incident has once again revived the debate over the limits of privacy and the consequences of sharing intimate materials in the public sphere.