Blerina Matraku has spoken publicly for the first time after the release of videos linking her to composer Adi Hila, raising strong claims of betrayal and a violation of privacy. In her statement, the singer said she was not aware that there were security cameras in the apartment and had believed there was only an alarm system.
Matraku’s claim of lack of knowledge
During her account on the program “Goca dhe Gra,” Matraku said she had only been aware of the existence of an alarm system in the apartment, but not of the presence of security cameras.
According to her version, if she had known there were cameras there, she would also have been aware of the possibility that they could be monitored from another location. She linked this to the fact that, during that period, there had reportedly been thefts, according to her account.
“I developed genuine feelings”
The singer said she had invested emotionally in the relationship and had considered Adi Hila one of the most trusted people in her life.
In her public statement, she said she had developed sincere feelings and had been ready to stand by him also because of the professional pressures that, according to her, he had at the time.
Withdrawing after learning he was not separated
Matraku said she does not want to give more details so as not to affect a family, but clarified that at the time she had believed the composer was separated.
She claimed she withdrew the moment she learned that the situation was not as she had initially understood it.
Moral accusations and a feeling of being used
In her statement, Matraku said she feels “betrayed,” “used,” and “sold” as a public figure, describing the situation as a blow not only personally, but also morally.
She also raised a serious point about privacy, claiming she had never imagined that in a home setting there could be security cameras without her knowledge.
Matraku’s statements present her version of events and place at the center of the debate the issues of privacy, consent, and the boundaries of trust in personal relationships.
At this stage, her public reaction remains a one-sided account of what she describes as betrayal and a misuse of trust.