U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance has reacted in strong terms to allegations related to Kimberly Guilfoyle, calling any attempt to sell access to White House officials “disgusting.” The statement comes at a time when the former U.S. ambassador to Greece is facing accusations denied by her lawyers, while U.S. institutions appear to be involved in reviewing the matter.
Strong reaction from Vance
In an interview excerpt for “CBS Evening News,” which is expected to air on Saturday, Vance said that anyone who tries to profit financially by offering entry or influence within the U.S. administration should face consequences.
He described such a practice as unacceptable, stressing the standard that, in his view, should apply to anyone claiming closeness to the White House.
Claims against Guilfoyle
The reaction is linked to reports that Kimberly Guilfoyle asked former Donald Trump donor Eric Deters to transfer $100,000 to pay off a credit card shortly before her confirmation in the Senate.
According to Deters’ version, access and support within the Trump administration were promised in return. These claims remain disputed and have been challenged by Guilfoyle’s side.
Vance calls for facts, not just reports
Although he used strong language about the idea of selling access, Vance was careful not to present the matter as settled. He said he wants to form a position based on facts and not only on what has been reported in the media.
This position suggests that, beyond the political reaction, the White House is trying to maintain formal distance until the claims are clarified.
The case could go beyond political debate
Asked whether the U.S. administration would respond to subpoenas as part of this case, Vance said the law must be followed. This is a signal that the case may not remain simply at the level of public statements.
Guilfoyle, sworn in as U.S. ambassador to Greece in September 2025, has also come under scrutiny over other reports mentioning luxury gifts and the involvement of a lobbyist in official meetings. Her lawyers have denied the accusations and argued that the sum mentioned was tied to overdue payments for consulting and speeches, while the U.S. State Department is investigating claims of inappropriate conduct.
For now, the matter remains at the stage of serious allegations, official denials, and an institutional investigation expected to clarify whether this involves actual violations or a clash of versions at the highest levels of the U.S. administration.