Artan Luku, an MP from the Agrarian Environmentalist Party, has dismissed speculation that he could join votes with the Socialist Party on territorial reform. In his public reaction, he makes it clear that he will vote against it and places himself in the same position as the opposition on this initiative.
Firm stance against the reform
Luku says he will not give a vote in favor of the territorial reform, closing the door on political interpretations linking him to possible support for the majority.
According to him, the vote against is not simply a formal position, but a political stance tied to the way this initiative is being pushed forward.
“Political whim,” not real reform
The PAA MP describes the initiative as a “political whim” and argues that it does not represent a genuine reform.
In his statement, he challenges the substance of the process, claiming that the decision-making did not come from a real debate with citizens and communities directly affected.
Criticism of the process and lack of consultation
According to Luku, the problem is not only related to the content of the territorial reform, but also to the way it has been politically constructed.
He claims it is a decision taken in political offices and then imposed on communities, without a clear vision and without genuine public consultation.
Aligns with the opposition’s vote
With this statement, Luku rules out the possibility of a vote in favor and confirms that in Parliament he will be part of the vote against this initiative.
His position comes at a time when every vote is being read politically, especially on an issue that affects territorial division and the relationship of power with local communities.
The PAA MP’s statement makes his positioning in this political clash clearer, reducing the weight of speculation about a rapprochement with the majority in the vote on territorial reform.
At its core, the debate remains not only about the votes in Parliament, but also about the question of whether such a reform is being built through real consultation or is being treated as a closed political decision.