The clash between the Special Court Against Corruption and Organized Crime (GJKKO) and the National Chamber of Advocacy is turning into another flashpoint in the justice system, as key institutions are being accused of inaction. In a public reaction, Ilir Meta raised his tone against Parliament and the High Judicial Council, claiming that their silence is deepening the crisis and harming citizens involved in proceedings.
Meta: Delays in proceedings are hurting citizens
In his reaction, Meta said the conflict between GJKKO and the National Chamber of Advocacy is causing delays in court proceedings and direct consequences for citizens.
According to him, this situation undermines not only the interests of the state and the smooth running of legal proceedings, but also the right to effective defense for the people involved in these cases.
Accusation of silence against Parliament
Meta directed sharp criticism at Parliament, which he said has not reacted to this institutional clash for two months.
He also drew attention to a legislative initiative submitted by the head of the Freedom Party parliamentary group, Tedi Blushi, on October 14, 2026, which he said was left out of the work calendar on October 22, 2026.
HJC also in the crosshairs
Along the same lines, Meta also accused the High Judicial Council of prolonged silence over the situation that has been created.
According to him, the lack of reaction from the High Judicial Council damages trust in the institutions that have constitutional responsibility for administering judicial proceedings.
Claim of a political backdrop
The strongest part of Meta’s reaction concerns his political interpretation of the conflict. He claims that the failure of institutional actors to react shows that this is a politically directed clash.
According to his version, this situation serves the interests of Prime Minister Edi Rama. Beyond the political accusation, the public reaction so far remains Meta’s one-sided position, while there has been no quoted response from Parliament or the High Judicial Council to these claims.
The clash between GJKKO and the National Chamber of Advocacy is once again raising questions about the normal functioning of the justice system and the role of the institutions that should intervene when proceedings are blocked.
In the absence of a clear reaction from the bodies mentioned, the debate remains open between political accusation and institutional responsibility for the consequences borne by citizens.